Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by x0x0 on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:22PM
(#9114706)
The major consumer isps have been crystal clear (unless you don't wish to understand): they look at large consumer-facing internet companies and want a piece of the action. eg the recent action by Verizon to charge Netflix money to deliver Netflix to Verizon's paying customers. So if we don't want pay-to-play internet companies, we need net neutrality. Particularly given the widespread monopoly structure of home internet access.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by tertius on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:34PM
(#9114826)
TitleII is not the solution for this problem.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by dragonwriter on Thursday February 26, 2015 @03:10PM
(#9115128)
Simply stating a conclusion is not an argument.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by URSpider94 on Thursday February 26, 2015 @03:01PM
(#9115057)
Can you explain why not?
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by tertius on Thursday February 26, 2015 @03:21PM
(#9115208)
The FTC exists to police competition and consumer protection.
TitleII is doomed to fail in court > http://techfreedom.org/post/110086459629/wheeler-ensures-fcc...