Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by tsax on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:15PM
(#9114639)
If content regulations happen, they'll come in with the new flavor of the month, i.e. 'social justice.' There will be vague statutes against 'harassment' I'm guessing, and anyone decrying their vagueness or broadness will be decried a racist, sexist shitlord. You won't get 80's style 'Christian moralism' language in 2020.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by copsarebastards on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:26PM
(#9114744)
> Are you suggesting it's some kind of conspiracy?
Despite the Tumblr feminist movement, I don't think most people are in favor of this sort of regulation, and there isn't sufficient monetary motivation that I can see for such regulation to happen.
However, I do agree that this kind of regulation would also be bad. But again: we can cross that bridge when (if?) we come to it.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by tsax on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:50PM
(#9114956)
Your mistake is to imagine that you have any power at all to affect such outcomes and processes. They will be guided by media/PR/social forces, not your arguments. I guess it's the universal democratic conceit of the 'we.'
To be frank, this isn't something I particularly fear. You're referencing TV regulation, but the main limiters on TV content are corporations owning the airwaves and people's fear of sex. The internet is not limited in space the way frequency bands are, and good luck trying to enforce pornography laws. Pornography laws are a limitation I worry about a bit, but so far I don't see any evidence that anyone is pushing for using utility regulation to limit pornography, and we can cross that bridge when (if?) we come to it.