Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by trose on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:43PM
(#9114893)
The guy you're replying to is scare mongering. We're at the step now where the FCC is opening the regulations up for public comment. Obviously they aren't going to release their footnotes before they've iterated on the regulations internally. All of the negative comments on here are essentially "why haven't we seen this yet?!?!?!" on the day they decided its ready for people to see. It's all quite childish bickering bordering on obvious public opinion manipulation.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by bmelton on Thursday February 26, 2015 @05:36PM
(#9116051)
> Does anyone have any viable solutions to this problem?
Lawmakers could either abstain or vote No until they've read and understood the legislation. The problem is that votes aren't generally cast on understanding, or even how the law will affect the welfare of the populace, but on party lines, with not enough exceptions.
On the cure for that, I am equally clueless.
This is a huge problem. It is literally impossible for lawmakers and regulators to read everything they put into law, as many bills are hundreds of pages long.
Does anyone have any viable solutions to this problem? The only attempt to solve this problem that I know of was in early 18th Century England, when they set a limit on the word count of laws. But this was widely criticized (including being lampooned in Gulliver's Travels) and didn't last long. It seems like this is a pretty intractible problem.