Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by paulhauggis on Thursday February 26, 2015 @01:35PM
(#9114242)
Yes, but both electricity and water don't really require innovation in the future. I can't remember the last time I wanted higher speed water in my house.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by ForHackernews on Thursday February 26, 2015 @01:40PM
(#9114292)
You almost couldn't be more wrong about that. Providing electricity and water are both massively complex undertakings, and ongoing innovation[0] is crucial to providing service for a growing population, and meeting the ecological challenges of tomorrow. California is in the middle of an epochal drought[1], and you're saying we don't need innovation in water?
[0] http://energy.gov/oe/services/technology-development/smart-g...
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote
by FireBeyond on Thursday February 26, 2015 @02:09PM
(#9114581)
Right. We have zero issues with water availability in the world. I guess those billions being poured into desalination, water recycling and alternatives are all, forgive the pun, money down the drain?
And you're absolutely right - we have zero need for alternative energy sources (although on that, it's kinda true - I've no particular issue with nuclear fission per se, though we need to figure out something better in regards to storage, and nuclear fusion is something that merits a huge deal of research into commercial viability).