News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Magic by nezumi on Sunday February 22, 2015 @05:45AM (#9088994)
The last time I had a problem with ATT I had to make multiple calls and spent over an hour in total on hold. How would you charge for that?

I'd have gladly paid for someone to take that pain away. There's probably a viable business model in there somewhere if someone can independently put a competent customer service layer in front of companies like ATT.

Re:Magic by dkfmn on Sunday February 22, 2015 @12:59PM (#9090213)
There's a service that will negotiate with them to reduce your bill. I remember reading about them last year, it's some Berkeley MBA who likes to practice negotiation, he might handle this too:

https://www.cabletipster.com/

Re:Magic by tommoose on Sunday February 22, 2015 @08:21PM (#9092065)
This looked quite interesting and useful right up until it asked me if I /really/ wanted to close the page.

That's very poor negotiation in my books.

Re:Magic by ollysb on Sunday February 22, 2015 @12:23PM (#9090067)
This would actually make a lot of sense if you could detect when a call came off hold. A small pool of operators could deal with calls as soon as the operator on the other end becomes available.
Re:Magic by qu4z-2 on Sunday February 22, 2015 @06:09PM (#9091651)
And if they're all busy, they could put ATT on hold. That I would love to do, even if they just immediately went on to the next call.