Re:Perfect colors, captured with one ultra-thin lens
by kenbellows on Friday February 20, 2015 @01:54PM
(#9082129)
I don't think that makes sense; otherwise, why would the thickness of the lens matter at all?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Perfect colors, captured with one ultra-thin lens
by sp332 on Friday February 20, 2015 @02:06PM
(#9082213)
It doesn't. Light can bend when it encounters a change in the index of refraction, e.g. air to glass or vice-versa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refraction#Explanation Light travels in a straight line after it has entered the glass, and again after it exits. Only the angle and the difference in refractive index matters. That's why you can build a Fresnel lens which is, so to speak, all surface. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_lens#Description
Re:Perfect colors, captured with one ultra-thin lens
by kenbellows on Friday February 20, 2015 @03:05PM
(#9082617)
that's really interesting. apparently I need to read up
Re:Perfect colors, captured with one ultra-thin lens
by vilhelm_s on Friday February 20, 2015 @02:02PM
(#9082175)
The shape of the lens puts the surface of the lens at the correct angle. You can make a thin lens by splitting it into many discontinuous parts, this is how a Fresnel lens works. See e.g. these two pictures:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Lens3b.sv... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fresnel_lens.svg
Re:Perfect colors, captured with one ultra-thin lens
by tomswartz07 on Friday February 20, 2015 @02:05PM
(#9082205)
OP above is correct.
The light will only bend at the interfaces between two mediums (air, glass).