News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sex redefined: the idea of two sexes is simplistic.

Re:Sex redefined: the idea of two sexes is simplistic by nickff on Thursday February 19, 2015 @02:32PM (#9076373)
The 'two-sexes approximation' is boolean, not binary. Boolean involves two possible values; binary involves an infinite number of possible values, represented in base-2.[1][2]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary

note: this is a re-post of a comment made on a child of the OP.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sex redefined: the idea of two sexes is simplistic by efuquen on Thursday February 19, 2015 @02:55PM (#9076526)
You are contradicted by the very Wikipedia article you posted: "Binary means composed of two pieces or two parts" You look it up in any dictionary and a similar definition will be given, which in the context of the article is a completely correct usage. Binary as a word predates computer science by quite a bit ...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sex redefined: the idea of two sexes is simplistic by Reebles on Thursday February 19, 2015 @02:49PM (#9076496)
No we are talking about binary.

In the very link you provided: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_binary

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sex redefined: the idea of two sexes is simplistic by untothebreach on Thursday February 19, 2015 @02:53PM (#9076516)
if we are considering wiki* sources legitimate, then let's visit the wiktionary page for "binary" that the Wikipedia page for "Binary" links to: [1]. The first definition is:

    Being in a state of one of two mutually exclusive conditions such as on or off, true or false, molten or frozen, presence or absence of a signal
So, the "two-sexes approximation" is binary :)

1: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/binary

[ Parent | on HN ]