Re:EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Col...
by evgen on Thursday February 19, 2015 @02:23PM
(#9076281)
But law enforcement is not using the encoded information, they are just taking a unique pattern from the information and using it for identification purposes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Col...
by remarkEon on Thursday February 19, 2015 @04:14PM
(#9077101)
I could for sure envision a situation where they use the encoded information. Let's say they find that the sample comes from a person who is predisposed to a heart condition and they already have a description putting him in the 40-50 age range. That's a pretty significant piece of information that can help narrow down a search or canvass, especially if there's any other meta data they can correlate to the crime.
Re:EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Col...
by bayesianhorse on Friday February 20, 2015 @12:03AM
(#9079027)
Why would your example be unreasonable? Sounds like good police work.
Just that it is very unlikely that you could infer the clinical manifestation of a heart condition just from DNA alone...
Re:EFF to Supreme Court: The Fourth Amendment Covers DNA Col...
by remarkEon on Friday February 20, 2015 @12:28AM
(#9079089)
No, I would not consider it unreasonable but a lot of people probably would. And I don't know enough about inferring future health conditions from DNA alone, but I meant it as an example for a future possibility. If anyone does know, exactly, what you can infer from DNA alone and how that would be extremely helpful.