News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“RNG broken for last 4 months” by sigzero on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @08:22PM (#9066456)
If you go here: https://www.freebsd.org/where.html

There is RELEASE, CURRENT, STABLE. If you choose one without knowing the difference as to what those titles mean, you deserve whatever comes next.

Re:“RNG broken for last 4 months” by soup10 on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @12:38AM (#9067173)
In my experience with open source projects, STABLE should be first on the download list. RELEASE should really be labeled release-candidate, with stable being considered the release.
Re:“RNG broken for last 4 months” by vertex-four on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @05:10AM (#9067764)
RELEASE is the release, -STABLE is the minor branch for bugfixes and minor new features that don't break backwards-compatibility ("stable ABI"). -CURRENT is, well, current - it's the tree the developers are working on, and is the current state of FreeBSD, where releases are archives at a particular point (more-or-less).

I suspect much of this goes back to when development wasn't quite so public, so these are names that are meaningful to the developers, not the public.

Re:“RNG broken for last 4 months” by garrettheaver on Wednesday February 18, 2015 @03:53AM (#9067593)
Three key words there - "In my experience". Well now you've experienced a project who doesn't fit your current model of the world. Should those of us who have RTFM and experienced different vocabularies adjust to your model or should you recalibrate?