News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by dragonwriter on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @11:15AM (#9063012)
> Why wouldn't most companies try to get employees to use Libre Office instead of MS Office?

Because the license cost savings are so small compared to the payroll costs of the people using the software that even a small hit in efficiency from existing staff (and new staff as rotation occurs) being less familiar will outweigh it quite easily.

Heck, its also why lots of firms give a pass to major version upgrades even when their license would allow the major version to be rolled out at no additional license cost until the version they are on is old enough that it is causing a drag because any new staff are having trouble converting back to the old version.

Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by joelthelion on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @03:14PM (#9064650)
I think the fact that MS has a good marketing is a better explanation.

Although I definitely agree that Word and friends are good products.

Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by chris_wot on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @11:55AM (#9063304)
Oh, so that explains why Office 2007 had such a massive takeup.
Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by ZenoArrow on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @12:17PM (#9063495)
Ribbon-era Excel had massive take up for a number of reasons, but there was certainly reluctance to switch (from what I saw at the time).

One of the biggest reasons the company I was working with at the time made the switch was sheet size, we came up against the 65536 rows limit at least once. Formula calculation speed was another big one. In many ways the ribbon does feel like a step forward, perhaps the only thing 2003 still does better is keyboard shortcuts, but luckily you can still use Excel 2003 keyboard shortcuts in newer versions if you can remember them (Alt,d,f,f and Alt,d,f,s are probably the ones I use most frequently).

Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by kevin_thibedeau on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @05:21PM (#9065521)
> we came up against the 65536 rows limit

At which point you have a database and would be better served with a different product designed to work with large data sets or moving data to external ODBC sources that Excel can query.

Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by davidgerard on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @08:10PM (#9066412)
This is true but empirically, nobody cares: they're gonna do it in a spreadsheet. So spreadsheet software has to allow for this massive use case, and arguing they're doing it wrong gets no traction.
Re:LibreOffice 4.4 review – Finally, it rocks by ZenoArrow on Tuesday February 17, 2015 @07:00PM (#9066086)
That only works if you have the IT infrastructure to support it. In the company I was referring to before, the IT team was effectively one guy. Plus, there was a considerable Excel expertise in the team I was in at the time, aside from calculation time Excel was working very well for what was needed.