News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask YC: AI by jey on Monday December 17, 2007 @11:26PM (#90597)
"I know of no general solution to what defines intelligence. So I'm very dubious as to whether an encompassing artificial version is possible."

Logical Fallacy Alert! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

I don't know how to build a rocket ship nor to do a heart transplant, but I'm fairly confident that these are both feasible.

Re:Ask YC: AI by robg on Tuesday December 18, 2007 @12:28AM (#90619)
It's not like people haven't been trying. Indeed, the great aspiration to understand humans is the effort to define our understanding (how's that for a circular argument?).

Moreover, you prove your own point - the one I was agreeing with initially out of everything said in this thread. A rocket ship or heart transplant are specific solutions to specific problems. The analogy to intelligence would be one universal solution to flight or one universal solution to getting oxygen and glucose into cells. It's not that a solution isn't possible. It's just that the hope for THE solution is misguided (see also THE cure for cancer).

I really like the flight analogy because of the length of time people put into finding THE solution. But what we end up with instead are rockets, and prop planes, and jet engines, and airfoils, and gliders, and helicopters, and hoverboards...