News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 1-2 year SSD wear on build boxes has been minimal. Parent comment

Re:1-2 year SSD wear on build boxes has been minimal by gonzo on Sunday February 15, 2015 @04:05PM (#9054124)
Micron is the name behind Crucial.

Kingston has gotten very good (and they used to suck) at least in the eMMC space (not quite a SSD, but close).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:1-2 year SSD wear on build boxes has been minimal by kabdib on Monday February 16, 2015 @10:12AM (#9057186)
Crucial are the drives I've been ripping out. Enterprise class. They just died after 2 years of service and not really all that much wear, won't talk to the outside world anymore.

I nailed one to the wall of our IT lab as a warning not to buy any more of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:1-2 year SSD wear on build boxes has been minimal by rasz_pl on Sunday February 15, 2015 @08:41PM (#9054938)
>Kingston has gotten very good

...at ninja swapping components under same model name, google V300

[ Parent | on HN ]