News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by DanielBMarkham on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @08:41AM (#905299)
At first blush, this seems cheesy, but it's the wave of the future.

Pieces of dead people are going to persist more and more on the net. The pieces will become more and more interactive and eventually dead people will outnumber living people on the net.

Sounds strange, but that's the trend.

Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by jimbokun on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @09:11AM (#905334)
It's just hard to get the tone just right. Obviously, they need to handle dead people's pages somehow. But they don't want to look like they are profiting off of it, either. They certainly don't want to seem like they are "memorialising" the deceased just as a way to keep getting ad impressions for someone even after they are gone.
Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by DanielBMarkham on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @09:36AM (#905380)
Agreed. I think it's going to take a long time to get the tone just right.

But technology may not wait for human protocols to catch up. It would be very easy, for instance, for me to write a program that visited various forums and posted jokes. This bot could run in the cloud. In fact, people are already doing similar things.

Right now it's just static content, and content owned by one service, so we can look to that service for some kind of decorum. But as more computational power gets controlled by individuals, this content will become more dynamic and more fluid. Then it's kind of hard to know whom to, er, blame.

Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by mechanical_fish on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @10:02AM (#905411)
Technology has not waited. People need memorial rituals. I realized this the other week, when we held such a ritual on HN.

I can't physically get to a funeral for everyone I now know. And that's too bad, because funerals are good for people. You need a way to memorialize someone, preferably by gathering in a place, and preferably with a strong ritual component, like the lighting of candles or the gathering around a gravesite or the recitation of formal prayers or sayings.

(Because ritual, among other things, is what we do when we want to say something heartfelt but unoriginal. It's unfair to force someone who has lost a friend to write a standalone obituary on a blog. There are a lot more mourners in the world than writers, you want to be able to mourn for people that you don't know well enough to memorialize in prose, and writing public statements of memorial is often not self-effacing enough. Your real desire is to call attention to your deceased friend, so it seems unseemly to risk calling attention to oneself instead.)

Good for Facebook for figuring a lot of this out. But there will need to be more of this, because you're right: The web, and our network of acquaintances on that web, is going to outlive us all.

Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by RyanMcGreal on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @11:44AM (#905577)
I'm the editor of an online magazine (volunteer-based, no ads) that allows comments. On a few occasions when we've posted reports on deaths, those reports have attracted comments from people who knew the deceased and wanted to leave a message somewhere.

It's strange and touching that a site intended to discuss urban issues might also serve as a de facto online memorial, but there you have it: people will find their own uses for any reasonably open system.

Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by khafra on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @09:51AM (#905400)
Considering the trends I've seen toward memorializing the dead in decals on car windows, I don't think it'll be too hard to get the tone close enough to right to last them 'til the Singularity.
Re:Facebook 'memorialises' profiles by catch23 on Tuesday October 27, 2009 @12:08PM (#905632)
Lots of people create web pages for the deceased where visitors can add comments to. This seems like an obvious thing for Facebook to do.