News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Haskell in Production. Parent comment

Re:Haskell in Production by coolsunglasses on Saturday February 14, 2015 @08:48PM (#9051512)
>As to your specific explanation, I think it falls down with IO ().

I was trying to avoid replies like this with my disclaimer at the beginning of my comment. I've deleted it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5072224

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Haskell in Production by peteretep on Saturday February 14, 2015 @09:33PM (#9051594)
Don't ask for feedback if you're only looking for encouragement?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Haskell in Production by coolsunglasses on Saturday February 14, 2015 @10:47PM (#9051716)
I knew the explanation didn't cover `IO ()` and some other corner cases, I hinted at the fuller understanding in the second half of my comment.

I was trying to avoid the low-effort dismissal you put forth by saying it was a very silly explanation.

What do you think you've accomplished?

[ Parent | on HN ]