Re:Why OCaml, why now? (2014)
by tel on Saturday February 14, 2015 @07:57PM
(#9051385)
I'm very much a fan of that POV. I think OO has a lot of mythology, but the technology is relatively similar to something like OCaml or Haskell. Classes are essentially just functions which return "structures".
Inheritance and open-recursion/dynamic binding are usually what remain. I'm not terribly sure I miss them.
Inheritance and open-recursion/dynamic binding are usually what remain. I'm not terribly sure I miss them.