Re:Rust 1.0: Status report and final timeline
by omega_rythm on Saturday February 14, 2015 @03:47PM
(#9050744)
Did you give a shot at other languages in the same category as F#, like Haskell, Ocaml, Clojure or Elixir?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rust 1.0: Status report and final timeline
by MichaelGG on Sunday February 15, 2015 @01:32AM
(#9051945)
To replace the F# side of things? F# is pretty unique as far as performance/language/tooling goes. It's outclassed in specific cases, but overall it's a great package.
The alternatives you listed aren't known for being able to write top-performance idiomatic code (I've got something _working_ in F#, but it's ugly non-idiotmatic code). The overhead of a GC is just too much to pay when doing linerate networking. Rust allows me to keep nice, high-level, idiomatic style, without paying any overhead. I can account for almost every byte.