News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Expedia Buys Orbitz for $1.6B in Cash by MichaelGG on Thursday February 12, 2015 @01:45PM (#9040500)
The catch, in my anecdotal experience, is that third parties have terrible integration with the hotels. In some cases, they fax a reservation using a company credit card, to pay on your behalf. End result is some percent of the time, this gets messed up and you end up dealing with an annoyed person on check in that sometimes ends up having to get the agency on the line to sort it out.

Same for flight bookings. I've never found the attraction of booking through third parties; it only adds a failure point. Maybe small or specialized agencies are the exception, like Amex's travel service (which, I think, used a platform like Expedia's, but they had fantastic phone options and would always go figure stuff out on my behalf.)

Re:Expedia Buys Orbitz for $1.6B in Cash by _delirium on Thursday February 12, 2015 @05:27PM (#9041807)
I agree in many cases, but two cases in which I book through the third-party sites:

1. For hotels, where the hotel itself doesn't actually have an online-booking system. Not very common in the U.S., but common among smaller hotels in Europe. Often a third party (most often booking.com) is the only way to book these hotels online.

2. For flights, where Orbitz or Expedia are able to put together a multi-airline itinerary that I can't get those airlines' own sites to return. The last time I used Orbitz was for this reason: it was able to come up with a round-trip ATL-CPH with Delta one way and KLM the other way, with a good price and times that were convenient for me. The fare rules work because they're partner airlines (so it ends up billed as a round-trip, not two one-ways), but I couldn't manage to get either the KLM or Delta websites to offer me that combination, despite quite a bit of fiddling.

Re:Expedia Buys Orbitz for $1.6B in Cash by zippergz on Thursday February 12, 2015 @02:01PM (#9040620)
Indeed, the only thing I use the third-party sites for is search. For example, to get a quick overview of which airlines have flights to the place I'm going to, or what the available hotels are and their relative prices. And then I go and book directly through the airline or hotel. The price difference is usually minimal or non-existent, and it drastically reduces opportunities for problems.
Re:Expedia Buys Orbitz for $1.6B in Cash by toomuchtodo on Thursday February 12, 2015 @03:24PM (#9041154)
> The catch, in my anecdotal experience, is that third parties have terrible integration with the hotels. In some cases, they fax a reservation using a company credit card, to pay on your behalf.

I know for a fact Hotel Tonight does this, as I've seen the fax from the front desk clerk with their corporate mastercard number (partly redacted) on it.

Re:Expedia Buys Orbitz for $1.6B in Cash by chrismcb on Friday February 13, 2015 @04:21AM (#9043542)
As a world traveler the only time I've ever had with booking a hotel is when I used a hotels own website. One advantage of using a third party site is better ui. And if you use a large enough site, they have their own customer support