News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Building and Running .NET’s CoreCLR on OS X by jbigelow76 on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @01:21PM (#9028862)
According to whom? And what is the current recommended GUI toolkit?
Re:Building and Running .NET’s CoreCLR on OS X by praeclarum on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @02:03PM (#9029144)
Windows RT (aka Metro, aka Store Apps). It's a model based on WPF but not fully compliant - it took in lessons learned form Silverlight. Call it WPFlight.
Re:Building and Running .NET’s CoreCLR on OS X by MichaelGG on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @05:10PM (#9030268)
That's the toolkit if you want Metro apps, dealing with MS's crappy store, etc. etc. If you want a traditional Windows application that just works, then WPF is fine. (And I think WPF has an option for non-blurry text rendering, whereas every Metro app seems to be blurry.)
Re:Building and Running .NET’s CoreCLR on OS X by jbigelow76 on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @02:12PM (#9029217)
Okay, yeah, so still XAML. I've only recently looked into Windows RT, my time was always spent in ASP.NET, so WPF/WinRT/Silverlight, it all seems like the same thing to me, but I do know a lot of Windows app developers that bitch up a storm about the diffs between WinRT XAML and what can be done in WPF :)
Re:Building and Running .NET’s CoreCLR on OS X by praeclarum on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @03:58PM (#9029849)
The truth is they are essentially the same. I just draw the distinction because porting apps between them isn't always automatic.