News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Defending GCC considered futile by dragonwriter on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @10:59AM (#9027935)
> Basically, with "bsd licensed" software, if a big company hired up all the developers, they could take it proprietary and out-compete fork efforts.

Well, look, sure, if you hire all the developers that are working on something and understand it, you can probably out-compete other implementations even if all you have the old developers do on your proprietary project is write up specs from which a different set of developers build a legally non-derivative interoperable implementation.

That may be a risk with permissively-licensed Free software, but its also a risk with copyleft Free software and proprietary software.

Re:Defending GCC considered futile by davidw on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @11:05AM (#9027990)
My experience is that specs - even will written ones - are far enough from working, tested code that it's going to be significantly easier to take the BSD project proprietary than to build a competitor to a GPL licensed one from scratch. Also, to be attractive to the 'core group', I think working on new stuff is more interesting.