Re:This Uncanny Valley of Voice Recognition
by tashoecraft on Monday February 09, 2015 @04:08PM
(#9023746)
I'd really like it if someone condensed that article and removed all attempts to be funny or sound extremely clever.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:This Uncanny Valley of Voice Recognition
by holman on Monday February 09, 2015 @04:14PM
(#9023793)
I'll give it a shot:
> Buzz Lightyear walks into a bar called the "Uncanny Valley" and asks the bartender for a vodka soda. The bartender gives him a vasectomy. Voice recognition is important!
Re:This Uncanny Valley of Voice Recognition
by smlacy on Monday February 09, 2015 @04:17PM
(#9023813)
"Siri's voice recognition is kind of bad some of the time. I've extrapolated this observation to all other voice recognition systems"
Re:This Uncanny Valley of Voice Recognition
by StavrosK on Monday February 09, 2015 @05:35PM
(#9024246)
I have been extremely impressed by Google's voice recognition. It got things right that I never thought it would, such as homophones or proper names.
I don't mean to belittle you or Google's speech team, but neither homophones nor proper names are considered hard problems in modern automatic speech recognition.
Re:This Uncanny Valley of Voice Recognition
by StavrosK on Monday February 09, 2015 @11:42PM
(#9025421)
I don't remember the case exactly, but it was something that was hard to resolve, at least it seemed so to me.
"But if we can ever jump past this uncanny valley, that’s where we’ll basically build AI."
To me this seemed like the main conclusion of the post.
And I agree. Voice recognition seems like an AI-complete problem. I think conversations will always be awkward and frustrating until Siri can construct a mental model of my habits, my particular turns of phrases and accent, what I'm up to right now, what I think is important, who else is in the room, etc. etc. I don't think you can (only) throw deep learning at the problem and expect anything but superficial responses. (Maybe if you had one neural net per user?)