News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Pentagon’s electromagnetic ‘rail gun’ makes its publi... by jessriedel on Monday February 09, 2015 @02:27PM (#9023103)
This video is a bit goofy, but has a good introduction to a lot of the relevant factors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moo5nuLWtHs

The short answer is that it is a plausible mechanism for g-hardened payloads, but probably not for soft payloads (like human beings). The problem is that accelerating up to orbital velocity at the maximum survivable continuous rate (~4 or 5 g) still takes hundreds of miles, which is probably an infeasible length for a barrel. Additionally, if it's not somehow supported so that it rises above the atmosphere, the de-acceleration from drag at the exist of the barrel is also too extreme.

There are no comments on this comment yet.