News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boycott docker by TZer0 on Tuesday February 10, 2015 @06:07AM (#9026469)
"Software developers forced to vendor lock-in their software, forced to make it workable under strict restrictions like single process per container."

This is very incorrect. You can run as many processes as you'd like inside a docker, but it was made with the intention of running a single one.

Re:Boycott docker by mikewhy on Monday February 09, 2015 @12:42PM (#9022449)
> Security. Never heard of it > No authentication at all. Just trust Docker Hub.

or ... run your own registry like you would for internal gems or other similar things?

FUD harder, article

Re:Boycott docker by ledzep2 on Monday February 09, 2015 @05:57AM (#9020564)
As far as I know, running sshd in docker is totally possible and there's a tool called docker-enter which would make things even easier.
Re:Boycott docker by amouat on Monday February 09, 2015 @10:12AM (#9021501)
Yeah, the author's main argument seems to be you can only run one process in a Docker container, which is utterly false.

It's fair to say it's idiomatic to run one process per container, but it's definitely not the only way and it's common to find multi-process containers.

Re:Boycott docker by SlipperySlope on Monday February 09, 2015 @11:17AM (#9021914)
An ant stopping a highway roller ...