News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube Ditches Flash, and It Hardly Matters by AnthonyMouse on Saturday February 07, 2015 @02:22AM (#9013362)
As an actual example of the problem, there are millions of PowerPC Macs out in the world that run perfectly adequately with Linux and are capable of playing HD video. Is the opaque binary blob hardware-independent?

If it is then I can't even imagine what its purpose is supposed to be. If my "hardware" is a virtual machine that captures the video output to a file then the blob isn't even doing anything. And if it's not hardware-independent then there are obviously going to be innumerable minority platforms that it doesn't support.

Re:YouTube Ditches Flash, and It Hardly Matters by Matumio on Saturday February 07, 2015 @03:12AM (#9013438)
I think they have given up to prevent you from capturing the output. The binary blob does decryption and decoding in one step, which prevents you from replaying the compressed stream.
Re:YouTube Ditches Flash, and It Hardly Matters by AnthonyMouse on Saturday February 07, 2015 @04:03PM (#9015295)
I don't understand how that is even supposed to be useful. The output is still digital HD video. The higher the quality of the video the fewer compression artifacts there are going to be and the less having to re-encode once will make any difference whatsoever. And it would only have to be re-encoded once regardless of how many times it's played back or copied subsequently. If they're hoping for some kind of VHS-style degradation of the video quality they obviously haven't actually tested it.
Re:YouTube Ditches Flash, and It Hardly Matters by raverbashing on Saturday February 07, 2015 @03:05AM (#9013425)
"there are millions of PowerPC Macs out in the world that run perfectly adequately with Linux and are capable of playing HD video"

I think you might be too optimistic on this one.

Not to mention most of these are probably running with 512Mb to 2GB RAM (G5 iMacs go to 2GB, PowerMacs to 8GB, some go to 16GB)

Re:YouTube Ditches Flash, and It Hardly Matters by AnthonyMouse on Saturday February 07, 2015 @03:34PM (#9015216)
I suspect you could coax 720p out of a 1GHz+ G4 if the code was sufficiently optimized -- another obvious problem with putting the video decoder in a black box.

But more importantly, the point is not the exact quantity of particular models of PowerMac in existence, the point is that if I have one which is otherwise capable of it, this nonsense interferes with me doing it.

And the same goes for every other thing that doesn't fit a mold. What about Linux on a PS3? What if I have a PA-RISC/Itanium/Power/etc Unix workstation? What if I'm using X forwarding so that my "browser" is really running on an UltraSPARC server?

It breaks anything the central planning committee didn't contemplate a priori or can't be bothered to fix. And it's not just old hardware, it's anything new or different. It keeps new platforms from getting off the ground.