News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The man who brought us the lithium-ion battery has an ide... by semi-extrinsic on Thursday February 05, 2015 @06:32PM (#9006900)
We are actually not so far away from hitting the ceiling with batteries. There are fundamental physical reasons for why you can't put much more than 1eV per atom in a battery. That equates roughly to 850 Wh/kg, if memory serves, and we are currently pushing Li-ion towards 300 Wh/kg. So we can only keep growing at 5% for another couple of decades or so. Regardless of battery chemistry.

What people often do to hide this fact is talk about energy density, Wh/L, where growth can continue for longer, at the expense of making batteries heavier.

Re:The man who brought us the lithium-ion battery has an ide... by Filligree on Thursday February 05, 2015 @07:04PM (#9007034)
Gasoline manages 12kWh/kg, and I'm sure I've heard people talking about batteries at least approaching that density before, even if only on a theoretical basis.

Leaving aside how safe I'd feel with a supercap of that density under the hood, are you sure about the 800Wh/kg limit? I'd be very interested in seeing a reference.

Re:The man who brought us the lithium-ion battery has an ide... by semi-extrinsic on Friday February 06, 2015 @02:15AM (#9008020)
The 1eV per atom is really a rule of thumb, but easy to understand: At that value you are getting dangerously close to the ionization energy 13.6 eV for hydrogen, 5.4 eV for lithium), so you can no longer have a chemical battery. Note also that this is average eV for all atoms in the battery, so those actually providing electricity will be carrying atound 1.5 - 2 eV.

See e.g. here: http://www.ohio.edu/people/piccard/radnotes/radioactive.html

Re:The man who brought us the lithium-ion battery has an ide... by jontro on Thursday February 05, 2015 @08:13PM (#9007254)
Found this article discussing some limits http://chargedevs.com/features/three-of-a-kind-polyplus-reac...