News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A little thing to love about Perl 6 and COBOL by kagamine on Thursday February 05, 2015 @02:32AM (#9002155)
Why not Perl 2000? It's both futuristic and original.

I don't think the name is the problem, I think that there is just too much competition among languages. If you ask a younger person which language they want to learn, will they think of Perl at all? Where is it used? Everywhere isn't an answer, Web or application programming or Apps are answers. What can I use instead that recruiters think is cool/relevant is also a fair question, albeit a simultaneously stupid one.

Re:A little thing to love about Perl 6 and COBOL by lumpypua on Thursday February 05, 2015 @03:27AM (#9002253)
Maybe I'm missing sarcasm. Perl 2000 is the definition of out of touch. 2000 was fifteen years ago.
Re:A little thing to love about Perl 6 and COBOL by davidgerard on Thursday February 05, 2015 @04:31AM (#9002384)
2000 was when the Perl 6 effort started.
Re:A little thing to love about Perl 6 and COBOL by henpa on Thursday February 05, 2015 @06:29AM (#9002696)
"Perl 3000" then! That should do it!
Re:A little thing to love about Perl 6 and COBOL by wues on Thursday February 05, 2015 @11:42AM (#9004162)
Then Perl 6 aka 2000 would share the fate of Wordstar 2000. But I guess it will anyway.