The Peachfuzz Billionaires

Posted by danielha on Saturday December 15, 2007 @09:35PM
from the newsweek.com dept.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/78152

( 7 comments | 19 points | on HN )

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by dcurtis on Sunday December 16, 2007 @02:51AM (#90050)

Newsweek just completely lost my respect when a video 2/3rds the way down the page started automatically playing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by davidw on Sunday December 16, 2007 @05:15PM (#90176)

They lost most of my respect when my parents got a subscription during my high school years, and I read the articles.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by jey on Sunday December 16, 2007 @12:10AM (#90031)

Diagram summarizing the Zuckerberg talk referred to in the article: http://www.killnine.com/comics/25.php

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by ereldon on Sunday December 16, 2007 @12:11PM (#90116)

"No matter the intent, though, the speech seemed to fit the Valley's growing cult of youth, if not a movement, based on 'Don't Fund Anyone Under 30.'"

Under?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by icky on Sunday December 16, 2007 @03:37PM (#90160)

Probably an error caused by Mr. Levy's extreme ancientness... ;-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by ctkrohn on Sunday December 16, 2007 @08:08PM (#90201)

Funny thing is, none of them (I think) are billionaires, in the sense of having at least one billion dollars in liquid financial assets.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Peachfuzz Billionaires by dcurtis on Monday December 17, 2007 @03:59AM (#90283)

You don't think, if Mark Zuckerberg tried to sell his share, he could get more than a billion?

On paper or not, he's worth more than a billion dollars.

[ Parent | on HN ]