Re:Google SoundScript: faster OOP for JavaScript
by drapper on Wednesday February 04, 2015 @05:08PM
(#9000313)
Yes, but let's admit it, the presence of classes will inevitably lead to their ever-presence, if only for the fact that they are what most people coming from other languages are used to.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google SoundScript: faster OOP for JavaScript
by masklinn on Thursday February 05, 2015 @03:38AM
(#9002272)
The absence of class already leads to their ever presence, each project simply reimplements its own instead of using the built-in syntactic sugar. The class sugar is simply a way for the creation of (prototype + constructor) pairs not to be a pain in the ass, nothing more and nothing less.