News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by akkartik on Thursday October 22, 2009 @01:35PM (#897207)
The investment means YC will now advise more companies in every batch, so it will have to spread itself thinner when it comes to advice and introductions.
Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by pg on Thursday October 22, 2009 @03:29PM (#897470)
It's not true we have to spread ourselves thinnner when it comes to advice. The startups we fund book office hours with me online. I can tell when demand is satisfied, because there are slots still open.

And we couldn't spread ourselves too thin with introductions, because the supply of those is not even limited. Later stage investors are delighted to hear about any good startup we can send them. If we send an investor twice as many good deals, they're twice as happy.

Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by akkartik on Thursday October 22, 2009 @03:36PM (#897485)
I see.

Are office hours a good measure of advice? What about the dinners?

Is the advice really completely stateless?

Some of the benefit of YC comes from networking between the teams. I think this benefit may diminish as the group grows.

Just thinking up objections.

Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by pg on Thursday October 22, 2009 @03:46PM (#897507)
I don't think my advice has gotten any stupider. If anything, probably better, because I've seen so many startups' paths now.

It's funny you should use the word stateless, though, because one of my tricks for scaling is to keep all the state on the client. E.g. I tell the startup "remember to tell me x next time we talk." I've been doing that for a while, and it seems to work fine.

Networking between the startups has actually increased. The more startups there are, the more likely you are to be in the same batch with another one that would be a natural beta user for your product, or that happens to be expert in some technology you have questions about. Maybe there would be problems with startups connecting if there were 1000 in every batch, but between 8 (summer 05) and 26 (summer 09) things just get better.

Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by akkartik on Thursday October 22, 2009 @04:09PM (#897552)
Very cool, thanks for those responses.

I remember 'stateless' from last year's 'Be Good' startup school talk.

Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by pg on Thursday October 22, 2009 @04:11PM (#897558)
Ironic; I didn't.
Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by bravura on Thursday October 22, 2009 @05:22PM (#897693)
Not ironic, since you are following your own advice.
Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by ig1 on Thursday October 22, 2009 @07:58PM (#897972)
Earlier on this year I was having dinner with a bunch of start-up founders in London (all non-yc I believe, but well connected with the yc community), and your comment on statelessness was bought up, I think you managed to get it stuck in quite a few heads.
Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by owinebarger on Thursday October 22, 2009 @09:08PM (#898062)
Shared processor, multiple memory sequential computation....
Re:Ask HN: Will Y Combinator taking Sequoia investment hurt ... by gruseom on Friday October 23, 2009 @01:58AM (#898349)
Whoops, meant to upvote but hit down instead. The human web app analogy is hilarious.