News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by gcv on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @04:55PM (#895594)
Doesn't the documentation have to then become as rigorous as code --- effectively a high-level language in its own right? So writing the documentation becomes, well, just like writing a program without testing it as you go, without benefit of tests or (if desired) static type checking. If so, then the development process turns the programmer into a kind of human compiler: translating the specs into a dialect of C for the safety-certified compiler.
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by spitfire on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @08:52PM (#895996)
Actually the formal document languages have type checking and consistency analysis systems/tools.

Tools like Alloy[1] allow you to write your documentation/definition and check its consistency. These languages are always limited so you don't get into Gödel incompleteness problems.

1. http://alloy.mit.edu/alloy4/