News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on U.S. Spies on Millions of Cars. Parent comment

Re:U.S. Spies on Millions of Cars by woodman on Tuesday January 27, 2015 @01:52AM (#8951709)
What is more likely: I was suggesting that people secure their homes with a moat; or I was demonstrating that, contrary to the post I was responding to, not all security relies upon obscurity?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Spies on Millions of Cars by JetSpiegel on Tuesday January 27, 2015 @05:54AM (#8952406)
Most people can't have moats, they don't live in detached houses. Apartments and high rises are much more common, moats don't work there.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Spies on Millions of Cars by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday January 27, 2015 @03:00AM (#8951958)
And what good is physical security if you don't have it? If it doesn't exist in practice then pointing out that it exists in theory is just being pedantic.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Spies on Millions of Cars by woodman on Tuesday January 27, 2015 @03:59AM (#8952083)
lol, ok buddy - being described as pedantic by a person who just helpfully volunteered the revelation that normal people don't have moats is just too weird.
[ Parent | on HN ]