News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by pilif on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @10:20AM (#894692)
(because(as(my(coworker(said:(the(human(brain(is(no(f*ing(pushdown(automata)))))))))))))

SCNR

Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by swannodette on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @12:12PM (#894930)
<and yet="people"> <like> <writing> <html></html> </writing> </like> </and>
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by pilif on Thursday October 22, 2009 @11:48AM (#896932)
like? Not really. But at least I have a chance at spotting syntax errors by eye without the help of an editor.
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by dreish on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @10:59AM (#894765)
That's the easiest and most superficial rationalization for not bothering to try a Lisp (any Lisp), but also the least compelling argument against it, and likely not even the most significant actual reason you haven't bothered to learn it.
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by huherto on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @11:11AM (#894790)
It may not be a fundamental problem for people that know it well. But, first impressions matter nonetheless. Edit:Spelling
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by pilif on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @11:12AM (#894797)
I was joking about the syntax and the way how I just can't wrap my brain around reading lisp and matching parentheses.

I was not joking about the recursive and functional nature of Lisp, both of which I'm finding very interesting (and my coworker is, in fact, a big fan of Haskell)

Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by peregrine on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @11:20AM (#894815)
The editor should help you use parens. http://code.google.com/p/counterclockwise/wiki/ScreenShots#S...

Rainbow parens are really helpful and so is automatic paren matching....

Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey by authentic on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @01:13PM (#895093)
automaton