Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey
by swannodette on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @12:12PM
(#894930)
<and yet="people">
<like>
<writing>
<html></html>
</writing>
</like>
</and>
like? Not really. But at least I have a chance at spotting syntax errors by eye without the help of an editor.
That's the easiest and most superficial rationalization for not bothering to try a Lisp (any Lisp), but also the least compelling argument against it, and likely not even the most significant actual reason you haven't bothered to learn it.
It may not be a fundamental problem for people that know it well. But, first impressions matter nonetheless.
Edit:Spelling
I was joking about the syntax and the way how I just can't wrap my brain around reading lisp and matching parentheses.
I was not joking about the recursive and functional nature of Lisp, both of which I'm finding very interesting (and my coworker is, in fact, a big fan of Haskell)
Re:Why You Do Not Use Lisp -- a survey
by peregrine on Wednesday October 21, 2009 @11:20AM
(#894815)
The editor should help you use parens. http://code.google.com/p/counterclockwise/wiki/ScreenShots#S...
Rainbow parens are really helpful and so is automatic paren matching....
SCNR