Chess: Who will win in this riveting game of Math.random() vs. Math.random()?

Re:Chess: Who will win in this riveting game of Math.random(... by narag on Monday January 26, 2015 @03:40AM (#8946048)

I have a humble level and did checkmate both with two bishops and with bishop and knight... yes, I've found both finals. I had learned the mecanics years before, didn't remember exactly how, but it wasn't so difficult to find the path with enough time.

What I don't want to find is queen vs. rook. I played once queen and pawn vs. rook and won, but it was painful. It seems there are some masters that are specialists in drawing in this positions, even if it should always be a win. Computers with end tables have not this problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chess: Who will win in this riveting game of Math.random(... by antaviana on Monday January 26, 2015 @08:12AM (#8946809)

The mate King-Bishop-Night vs. King is a bit elaborate.

From a random position on the keyboard, you typically need around 20-25 moves to achieve it, and there is a rule that draws a game after 50 moves without any pawn moves.

I've seen an International Master offer draw to his opponent in KNB + K game because he didn't remember what the winning method was (I suposo that after 5+ hours playing your eroded mindset also plays a role.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chess: Who will win in this riveting game of Math.random(... by narag on Monday January 26, 2015 @11:15AM (#8947742)

I did remember the general strategy: take the opponent's king to a corner of the same colour as the bishop. There are a couple of moves that must be thought carefully. But the rest comes very naturally, provided you've practiced it a few times.

[ Parent | on HN ]