News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The $3500 Shirt – A History Lesson in Economics by derefr on Saturday January 24, 2015 @07:46PM (#8941653)
I don't blame building codes, but I do blame governments for just trying to derive their own building codes in an NIH fashion. Engineering best-practices (which is what building codes are) advance in global lock-step in every other industry, because—once it's proven that approach X fails less than approach Y under conditions Z—X should be used instead of Y for all Zs, no matter what country you find the Z in.

Regional considerations for things like earthquake proofing, density planning, etc. can be built into a single overarching engineering standard, just like considerations for different company shapes with different needs are built into a single larger tax code. There's nothing having many different local algorithms can optimize, that wouldn't be even more optimal as many different local parameter values to a single parameterized algorithm.

Re:The $3500 Shirt – A History Lesson in Economics by brudgers on Saturday January 24, 2015 @08:19PM (#8941725)
Building codes are not engineering best practices. They are minimum standards based on experience and filtered through the political process.

"Built to code" is the worst legally allowed construction. The equivalent in programming terms is "It compiles".