News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006). Parent comment

Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by lomnakkus on Saturday January 24, 2015 @02:40PM (#8940704)
I'm sorry, I don't quite get what you're trying to say. Are you saying that using/taking drugs is a prerequisite for talking about drugs (and drug use in general)?

If so: That's total nonsense and an unbelievably unscientific attitude.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by anonbanker on Saturday January 24, 2015 @02:52PM (#8940748)
Yeah, calling someone out on FUD is definitely unscientific. Thanks for that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by lomnakkus on Saturday January 24, 2015 @04:35PM (#8941119)
You have yet to substantiate your claim of FUD. (And your claim of unfitness-to-comment, but I'll leave it at that.)
[ Parent | on HN ]
[dead]
[dead]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by anonbanker on Saturday January 24, 2015 @07:23PM (#8941594)
One does not need to be a sock puppet account to astroturf.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by lomnakkus on Saturday January 24, 2015 @07:29PM (#8941610)
Again, I'm mystified. Please state your case plainly. Whom, exactly, are you accusing of astroturfing?

(I realize that this not necessarily contributing to NH as such, but I'm genuinely intrigued.)

[ Parent | on HN ]