News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006). Parent comment

Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by mathetic on Saturday January 24, 2015 @08:13AM (#8939509)
Care to elaborate?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by hepek on Saturday January 24, 2015 @08:35AM (#8939546)
Whenever there's a question mark in the title, the answer is usually no, and the article is linkbait.

I don't know if this rule of thumb applies to this article.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by k-mcgrady on Saturday January 24, 2015 @08:40AM (#8939558)
Betteridge's law of headlines [0]. The answer to the question is generally no - that doesn't make the article useless link bait though.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by jafaku on Saturday January 24, 2015 @02:14PM (#8940594)
You guys know scientists are supposed to ask questions, right?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LSD: The Geek's Wonder Drug? (2006) by Retra on Saturday January 24, 2015 @02:36PM (#8940689)
Scientists are supposed to ask GOOD questions.
[ Parent | on HN ]