News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by btilly on Friday January 23, 2015 @10:17AM (#8935209)
I thought this was going to be his older video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zGnxeSbb3g. But he's improved. Splitting an incoming arrow???
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by zaroth on Friday January 23, 2015 @10:20AM (#8935230)
And not even that but unloading with less than a second after spinning around from facing the other way? It actually puts Legolas to shame.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by btilly on Friday January 23, 2015 @10:42AM (#8935360)
The previous video did a time comparison. He shot 7 targets to Legolas' 6. In this video he's noticeably faster.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by wavefunction on Friday January 23, 2015 @11:35AM (#8935691)
Well, and they CGI'd the most of the movie's Legolas' "arrows" as well.

http://www.kotaku.com.au/2014/06/game-of-thrones-has-cgi-in-...

Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by jmelloy on Friday January 23, 2015 @06:01PM (#8937923)
Every arrow fired on Arrow is CGI due to crew and actor safety.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by regularfry on Friday January 23, 2015 @10:33AM (#8935303)
A second's quite a long time. Depending on the weight of the bows he's using, a quick, explosive release might be the only way he can actually put enough energy into the bow to get a shot off at all.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by Zibulon on Friday January 23, 2015 @06:57PM (#8938148)
I wouldn't worry about his bow weight. The trajectory of his arrow on one of outdoor shots show he is not even shooting 30 lbs. You can hold that as long as you want.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by smallhands on Friday January 23, 2015 @11:07AM (#8935524)
i wonder what happen when he fails
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by JoeAltmaier on Friday January 23, 2015 @10:39AM (#8935330)
We just saw the time it worked. And he had a big grin on his face. How many times did it fail?
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by bryanlarsen on Friday January 23, 2015 @12:36PM (#8936099)
One of the potential failure modes is getting hit with a arrow, so even failures are impressive.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by cryowaffle on Friday January 23, 2015 @11:36AM (#8935702)
Probably quite a few, but what's your point? That he shot enough arrows that it eventually hit without requiring significant skill? I tend to believe his success is above that of chance.
Re:Lars Andersen: a new level of archery [video] by Retric on Friday January 23, 2015 @12:49PM (#8936177)
The actual odds are not really that important as what you really care about is not the odds that that specific odd thing happen but how many odd things happen given enough time.

One of the more amusing examples was Ripley(sp?) from the 3rd Alien movie does a long distance one handed backward basketball shot that they were going to use CGI on. The funny thing is watching the movie you see very honest surprised emotions which seem almost to believable.

However, the actress actually made the shot during the take which is why all the actors have a much more believable WTF expression than normal. The only thing out of place is the actress expression where she must have been trying really hard not to blow the take.

Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOrTfA8QZyI 4:35

Anyway, my point was if she missed then nobody would have thought it odd. They were not going to try again until it happened, but once it did happen they wanted to use that 'good luck'. It’s sort of the best take effect, walk around and take 1,000 pictures and the chances are something unusual happens in that shot. The odds of that specific unusual thing happening are not high, but the odds of some unusual thing happening is.