News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:James Webb Space Telescope by sp332 on Friday January 23, 2015 @09:29AM (#8934963)
It's not just that IR is "more interesting" (maybe it is), but it's much more difficult to see through the atmosphere. It's obviously cheaper and easier to build huge optical telescopes on the ground, but to see into the infrared, you need to get above the atmosphere.

Edit: source http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/ir_tutor...

Re:James Webb Space Telescope by spdustin on Friday January 23, 2015 @11:17AM (#8935589)
IR is profoundly more interesting, precisely because it is able to penetrate all sorts of media, most especially interstellar dust and gasses, allowing JWST (and others) to see stars that can't be seen by their visible light.

Regarding our atmosphere filtering IR: do you feel the heat of the sun when it shines on you? That's light. Infrared.

Edit: Additional point of fact: our atmosphere interferes with light by scattering it away from its angle of incidence. Light with a longer wavelength is able to get through without scattering (IR, red, orange, yellow, etc) light with a shorter wavelength (blue) is more likely to collide with a molecule of something on the way in, and it gets bounced around so frantically that all those blue light waves seem to kind of pile up and come from everywhere. No, our atmosphere's light transmission woes are much more deleterious to the smaller wavelengths of light than to IR.

Re:James Webb Space Telescope by spdustin on Friday January 23, 2015 @11:25AM (#8935635)
True enough to the "notch filter" and the fact that the matter in the air emits IR radiation as well. IR still penetrates, visible light is scattered.