News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by firethief on Thursday January 22, 2015 @05:39AM (#8928463)
For a pedestrian hit by a car, legal liability is often not the main concern.
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by jeza on Thursday January 22, 2015 @07:10AM (#8928723)
Though in some countries, hitting a pedestrian gets the driver an automatic jail term. Collisions with pedestrians don't happen all that often in such countries.
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by troels on Thursday January 22, 2015 @08:19AM (#8928968)
I'd still rather be the driver in that scenario (Which I believe was the parent's point)
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by jeza on Thursday January 22, 2015 @07:01PM (#8932602)
I think I'd rather be neither.
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by droopyEyelids on Thursday January 22, 2015 @09:14AM (#8929190)
I agree and I find that a far more civilized legal approach to cars, but I don't ever count on that happening in America.
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by iamthepieman on Thursday January 22, 2015 @09:05AM (#8929156)
You may legally in the right but only your heirs will care.
Re:The rise of fake engine noise by mikeash on Thursday January 22, 2015 @10:28AM (#8929616)
It's not the main concern for the pedestrian, but it may be for the driver. If legal liability is clearly on the driver then drivers will be more careful. At least, many will, even if not all.