Re:Feds found Silk Road 2 servers after a six-month attack o...
by guelo on Wednesday January 21, 2015 @11:35PM
(#8927552)
But they did burn that valuable capability. Did they do it for no gain?
Re:Feds found Silk Road 2 servers after a six-month attack o...
by tptacek on Thursday January 22, 2015 @12:11AM
(#8927641)
How do you know who "they" is? The Tor project said it seemed like it could have been a research project.
Re:Feds found Silk Road 2 servers after a six-month attack o...
by sarciszewski on Thursday January 22, 2015 @05:44AM
(#8928477)
Academics would have no such motivational constraints unless working for the feds. They burn capabilities with wild abandon and still serve their own self-interest.
Thank you.
We must assume that the FBI is a rational and intelligent adversary (even if we have a difference of opinion on specific public decisions or press releases that impact our perception of their intelligence).
They're not going to expend the resources (or, as The Grugq might say, burn a valuable capability) to compromise a server when they already had a man on the inside (Cirrus).
I would be willing to accept that it's possible they were on a dragnet fishing expedition around the same time to see what they could sweep up, and they just happened to use this information to confirm the efficacy of their Tor attack. This would also explain Doxbin going down, but so would Doxbin and another target of theirs being on the same bare metal server.
> At first glance, it's an awfully big coincidence to write off, but there are mitigating factors.
Agreed. Given what is already public knowledge, it's far from the most likely explanation.