Re:The Cx programming language: digital hardware design for ...
by mng2 on Tuesday January 20, 2015 @04:29PM
(#8919740)
I wouldn't call it 'scary', myself, but it doesn't strike me as a particularly useful feature. In software, a single slow subroutine can simply take up more cycles. But in hardware, a slow path becomes your critical path, and you have a hard clock cycle requirement. (Sure, you can use multi-cycle paths and/or change clock speed, but those generally have to be adjusted manually/physically, and not all design situations will have that flexibility.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.