News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Clinton E. Curtis, programmer, testifies to Congress abou... by angryprofessor on Thursday December 13, 2007 @11:33AM (#89197)
There are certainly no problems with supervised recounts. Look how well they go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_gubernatorial_electi...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elec...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_200...

I'm not saying electronic is definately the way to go. I'm just saying that paper ballots also have big problems, and that one can protect reasonably well against pure software hacks.

Re:Clinton E. Curtis, programmer, testifies to Congress abou... by brlewis on Thursday December 13, 2007 @01:51PM (#89246)
You've pointed out exactly why supervised recounts with paper ballots are so much better. You can look how well they go.