News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flash Boys in the US Treasury Market by steveplace on Saturday January 17, 2015 @03:17PM (#8905379)
Simple fix to this.

Charge a cancellation fee for any orders cancelled under 150ms.

That way it's no longer advantageous to quote stuff or float out fake liquidity.

Re:Flash Boys in the US Treasury Market by galen211 on Saturday January 17, 2015 @03:19PM (#8905383)
define fake liquidity
Re:Flash Boys in the US Treasury Market by bostik on Saturday January 17, 2015 @04:45PM (#8905622)
I'll have a go.

If orders are pulled the moment someone actually tries to match the market price, it's a clear indication the parties putting up the offers were not willing to accept the price they had put up.

Re:Flash Boys in the US Treasury Market by jim_greco on Saturday January 17, 2015 @06:08PM (#8905912)
I think that's fair. It would mean much less liquidity available though as your risk taking capability was reduced. Would traders actually be willing to accept the much thinner books if some kind of economic or regulatory enforcement of this was in effect? Maybe if they knew it was 'higher' quality liquidity and they could depend on it being there.
Re:Flash Boys in the US Treasury Market by steveplace on Saturday January 17, 2015 @04:35PM (#8905593)
When an algo puts a bid in and pulls it quickly if the bids start getting hit. It makes the order book seem thick but if there is any decent order flow there is no liquidity to be found.