News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by schiffern on Saturday January 17, 2015 @01:56PM (#8905151)
>with tests like throwing metal chips (nuts?) into pumps

SpaceX did this test with the Merlin engines too. http://www.airspacemag.com/space/is-spacex-changing-the-rock...

The chamber pressure (and therefore Isp) are both dialed back for the sake of reusability. They're stated multiple times that they're not running those engines anywhere near their physical limits.

Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by avmich on Saturday January 17, 2015 @07:12PM (#8906074)
It's certainly good that SpaceX uses many ways to test hardware, including those approaches successfully used before. During development of F-1 some interesting debugging techniques were invented, some could be well applied in SpaceX.

Gas generator cycle in general doesn't allow reaching effective Isp as high as closed loop cycle. On the other hand, smaller pressure reduces stress and generally considered safer. NK-15 were single use engines, but NK-33 and most other modern engines are all reusable.