Re:Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split bil...
by CamperBob2 on Friday January 16, 2015 @06:23PM
(#8902448)
These same libertarians are the first to propose both open and conceal carry (of guns) which are the #1 enemy of free speech and civil discourse.
Because clearly the same cops you've been roundly criticizing as "highwaymen" elsewhere in the thread should have a monopoly on the possession of firearms.
I've got a better idea: you guys move to Somalia. I'm fine where I'm at.
Re:Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split bil...
by trhway on Friday January 16, 2015 @06:45PM
(#8902535)
>I've got a better idea: you guys move to Somalia. I'm fine where I'm at.
it is great to send people to Somalia while sitting in US. Doing so in Somalia would have quite different result through "private enforcement" :)
If you're really wealthy you have such good insurance that they negotiate sufficiently low compensation that you can in effect have anybody killed. And it's called feudalism. Or in early U.S. times, this was the American frontier, a.k.a. the wild west, and hired guns.
Libertarians think they have some new bright idea that's never been tried before to counter the fact we're ignorant violent primates. We want something enough, get pissed off enough, we become irrational. Having the irrational hire enforcers is old hat. And it leads to things like the gangs of New York, butchery in the streets, the warlords of Somalia.
These same libertarians are the first to propose both open and conceal carry (of guns) which are the #1 enemy of free speech and civil discourse. It says, "if you argue better than I do, I might just have to let my gun do the talking, so keep your mouth shut smarty pants." So I think libertarians are idiots and not to be trusted, especially if they're armed.