News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by jacquesm on Friday January 16, 2015 @01:35PM (#8900680)
Hard to make any of those work across intercontinental differences. Drones, cruise missiles and small robot helicopters need to be launched from a location relatively close to the target.
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by rwallace on Friday January 16, 2015 @07:38PM (#8902757)
A kitchen knife can work across intercontinental distances. Buy plane ticket to city where target lives, buy knife in local store, get taxi to location of target, stab target to death with knife. It's less glamorous than drones and missiles, but it's just as effective in the scenario that kicked off this thread, where one civilian decides to kill another even though he'll be writing off his own life in the process. Shinier weapons don't change that fundamental.
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by TheCraiggers on Friday January 16, 2015 @04:34PM (#8901872)
Drones, at the very least, would not be that hard. They're already developing a solar-powered drone that can stay in the air for years; crossing a few oceans are definitely in the realm of possibility.

http://www.popsci.com/article/technology/solar-powered-drone...

Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by kragen on Friday January 16, 2015 @06:02PM (#8902356)
Drones have been launched intercontinentally, although with a significant failure rate, since last millennium: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AAI_Corporation_Aerosonde
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time” by jacquesm on Friday January 16, 2015 @07:16PM (#8902655)
600 km/L, that's very impressive fuel economy.