Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time”
by jacquesm on Friday January 16, 2015 @01:21PM
(#8900575)
The hydraulic oil is not used as a 'fuel' to burn but to control the actuators for the grid fins. So if you lose control because you run out of hydraulic oil the last bit of the descent will be uncontrolled. So they almost made it with enough hydraulic oil, which means that next time the grid fins will work all the way down, which leaves a ton of other possibilities for mishap (too high a descent rate, rogue waves, barge being slightly at an angle and so on). Makes you wonder why the hydraulic circuit isn't closed, probably they figured an open loop system is more reliable than a closed one (half the gear and no need for a sump, which comes in handy when you have to deal with gravity coming from all directions).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time”
by mitchty on Friday January 16, 2015 @01:34PM
(#8900670)
Open loop is lighter than closed. No need for a closed loop if you have a set time of operation. I thought I heard they were also pumping the fuel through the system as well so I imagine this amounts to just a bit more propellant and another go.
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time”
by seanflyon on Friday January 16, 2015 @06:44PM
(#8902527)
> I thought I heard they were also pumping the fuel through the system as well
I think they use fuel as the hydraulic fluid for the gimbaling of the motors, but not for the grid fins.
Re:SpaceX: “Close, but no cigar. This time”
by mitchty on Friday January 16, 2015 @07:51PM
(#8902814)
That might be true, can't seem to quickly find a source for that so I'll just eat crow and look like a muppet on that one.