However the per year is bullshit. That's the cost to treat every person is California who has it. But it's expensive and popular because the cure rate is very high. That makes it more of a one time cost, not a per year cost.
Calculate the savings that curing those people produces over time (1, 5, 10, 20 years).
I'd be willing to bet the math works out in favor of spending $84,000 one time.
I'd love for the state to announce ahead of time how much they would pay for, say, a cure for diabetes. Have them calculate what the NPV is for a lifetime of diabetes treatment. Publish that figure.
Then some drug company can show up with a cure, charge 90% of that figure, and we can see people whine that the drug company is costing the state money.
So a drug company releases a cure for a disease and everyone complains about the price. Ironic.
Sofosbuvir costs US$84,000 for 12 weeks of treatment used for genotypes 1 and 2 (about US$1,000 per pill) [...] health care costs in California could increase by US$18–29 billion per year because of this medication