News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts prophet Muhammad. Parent comment

Re:Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts pr... by ddebernardy on Tuesday January 13, 2015 @07:46AM (#8879396)
To the Guardian's credit, they did actually publish the cover. As did Libération in France.

US news outlets, as well as some UK outlets, and certainly many more elsewhere including France, cannot be said to have done as much, e.g.:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/13/arts/international/charlie...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/1134...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts pr... by ddebernardy on Tuesday January 13, 2015 @09:15AM (#8879938)
Yep. Big hat to them, and shame on the NYT imho. In the UK, the Independent also published the cover in full.

Edit: it look like Buzzfeed went through a couple of sites:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/austinhunt/heres-who-is-and-isnt-pub...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts pr... by misnome on Tuesday January 13, 2015 @08:58AM (#8879827)
Right, I was a bit disappointed that the BBC had two separate articles on the cover, but neither included a picture of it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Charlie Hebdo: first cover since terror attack depicts pr... by flycaliguy on Tuesday January 13, 2015 @04:55PM (#8882899)
Perhaps the role of a public broadcaster makes things different. My understanding was that the CBC's decision not to run cartoons of the prophet Mohammad was based on their institutional duty to be inclusive to all Canadians. Ultimately they deemed they can sufficiently report this news without publishing material that will be offensive to a large portion of Canadians on religious grounds.
[ Parent | on HN ]