Re:What Happened to Old School NLP?
by psygnisfive on Monday January 12, 2015 @08:18AM
(#8873714)
Yep, I agree with what you say. Tho I would dispute calling a POS gloss much of a structure. When I think structure, I think full syntax. Parse + formal features. Or a full logical formula for the semantics! Now that's structure!
Fair enough, I think in my thesis I referred to it as a sentence representation. I think it may actually serve to be a good example of some of the compromises being done in application. Sometimes people need some of that high level useful information, but not within a deeper, more comprehensive format/structure for efficiency sake even if some knowledge and subsequent accuracy is lost. My experience was that some of the tools out there in NLP land didn't always make this an easy thing to do.
I get the impression that while it is true the computational side of computational linguistics has seemingly seen more attention for lucrative reasons, but now it is seeing some success there more people trying to incorporate more from the linguistic side, when it doesn't cause for a huge amount of computational expense.
It doesn't seem like anything new, however, that business needs drive funding for particular areas in academia. Sadly, more so than ever considering the greed of the school systems (but that is another topic).
[1] https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773...