Unfortunately, the website has marketing all over it. The only thing I could find on Google scholar was about how Netbase is doing parsing of Chinese, based on phrase chunking and then extracting dependency relations using phrase chunks.
I wonder if this is true for all the languages, since this is usually considered shallow parsing (and not deep parsing, a word that seems to be in the white papers). Constructing an 'old-school' grammar for deep syntactic analysis (I am thinking HPSG, CG, or LFG-style here) of 42 languages is a very tedious task if you want to get any decent coverage.
Re:What Happened to Old School NLP?
by lazzlazzlazz on Monday January 12, 2015 @05:41AM
(#8873192)
Not all languages receive the "deep" treatment. Eight, going on nine, have full-time linguists working on developing grammars.
Cool! The website says netbase supports 42 different languages, but not which languages.
Re:What Happened to Old School NLP?
by psygnisfive on Monday January 12, 2015 @03:02AM
(#8872889)
to find out which 42, we'll need to build a computer the size of a planet
Re:What Happened to Old School NLP?
by psygnisfive on Monday January 12, 2015 @02:45AM
(#8872862)
awesome! what sorts of things does NetBase do with old school NLP?
Re:What Happened to Old School NLP?
by lazzlazzlazz on Monday January 12, 2015 @03:39AM
(#8872947)
Social media analysis of many kinds is our full-time focus right now. It's a rapidly changing field. The demands of customers shift as they become more educated about what to expect from social media and how to push the boundaries of technology.
The end product is more accurate and quicker to adapt than the industry is used to.
Disclosure: I work in the engineering team at NetBase.